William and Mary
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
247  Radford Gunzenhauser JR 32:22
373  Trevor Sleight FR 32:43
420  Joshua Mercado-Reigh JR 32:49
505  Ryan Gousse SO 33:00
685  jr., David Barney FR 33:20
980  Nathaniel Hermsmeier SO 33:49
991  Faris Sakallah FR 33:49
1,110  Jacob Sears FR 34:00
1,233  Paul Gates FR 34:10
1,448  Nicholas Tyrey FR 34:27
1,616  David Pennesi FR 34:43
1,658  Thomas Feeney FR 34:46
1,836  David Gunnerson JR 35:02
2,090  Ian Macfawn SO 35:29
2,140  Richard Cappetta SO 35:34
National Rank #74 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #11 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.6%
Top 10 in Regional 87.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Radford Gunzenhauser Trevor Sleight Joshua Mercado-Reigh Ryan Gousse jr., David Barney Nathaniel Hermsmeier Faris Sakallah Jacob Sears Paul Gates Nicholas Tyrey David Pennesi
Virginia Panorama Farms Invitational 09/28 963 31:57 32:43 33:08 33:27 33:32 34:01 33:57 34:09 34:27
CNU Invite 10/19 1235 34:00 34:27 34:46
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 1024 32:38 32:51 33:27 33:07 33:33 33:01 33:51
CAA Championships 11/02 951 32:12 32:36 33:41 32:51 33:04 33:34 33:44 34:02 34:28 34:37
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 902 32:47 32:40 32:09 32:38 33:15 35:28 33:44





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 31.0 767 0.0
Region Championship 100% 8.6 273 0.0 0.4 2.1 6.5 17.2 25.0 22.0 13.8 7.1 3.0 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Radford Gunzenhauser 0.4% 118.5
Trevor Sleight 0.0% 208.5
Joshua Mercado-Reigh 0.0% 237.5
Ryan Gousse 0.0% 194.5
jr., David Barney 0.0% 196.5
Nathaniel Hermsmeier 0.0% 231.5
Faris Sakallah 0.0% 240.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Radford Gunzenhauser 27.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.6 3.8 4.1 3.5 4.3 3.5
Trevor Sleight 42.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.0 1.6
Joshua Mercado-Reigh 47.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4
Ryan Gousse 58.1 0.0 0.0
jr., David Barney 80.2
Nathaniel Hermsmeier 110.9
Faris Sakallah 112.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 50.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.4% 0.4 4
5 2.1% 2.1 5
6 6.5% 6.5 6
7 17.2% 17.2 7
8 25.0% 25.0 8
9 22.0% 22.0 9
10 13.8% 13.8 10
11 7.1% 7.1 11
12 3.0% 3.0 12
13 1.6% 1.6 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0